| TD: Rudimentary Assurance End Entity Certificate Naming

Rudimentary Assurance End Entity Certificate Naming, v1.0

Addresses naming requirements for End Entity certificates issued with a rudimentary level of assurance.

If an assessment step references organization-defined elements (E.g. <organization-defined personnel or roles>, <organization-defined frequency>, etc.), corresponding citations/excerpts must be provided to confirm that the organization has established and documented these values and that they apply as referenced in the conformance criteria.

Similarly, if a "Selection" among multiple options (e.g. [Selection (one or more): as needed; ]) is specified, evidence must be provided to establish that the option(s) implemented by the organization have been defined and documented.

The assessment step shall not be marked as satisfied without this evidence.

Assessment Step

1 Rudimentary Assurance End Entity Certificate Naming (RudimentaryAssuranceEndEntityCertificateNaming) Does the organization require that End Entity PKI certificates requiring a rudimentary level of assurance either contain a non-null subject Distinguished Name (DN), or a non-null Subject Alternative Name that is marked critical? Artifact A1 Provide evidence (e.g. organizational policies, procedures, compliance/assessment reports, etc.) that support the assessor's response to this assessment step.

If conformance criteria reference organization-defined elements (e.g. <organization-defined personnel or roles>, <organization-defined frequency>, etc.), these values must be defined and documented by the organization.

Similarly, if the criteria specify a "Selection" among multiple options (e.g. [Selection (one or more): as needed; ]), the option(s) implemented by the organization must also be defined and documented.

Conformance Criteria (1)

C1 Certificates issued at the Rudimentary level of assurance may include a null subject DN if they include at least one alternative name form. The table below summarizes the naming requirements that apply to each level of assurance. Rudimentary: Non-Null Subject Name, or Null Subject Name if Subject Alternative Name is populated and marked critical Citation FBCA-CP Section 3.1.1.

Show Metadata, Sources & Terms

Hide Metadata, Sources & Terms

Metadata

Identifier

https://artifacts.trustmarkinitiative.org/lib/tds/rudimentary-assurance-end-entity-certificate-naming/1.0/

Publication Date

2018-10-29

Issuing Organization

Trustmark Initiative (https://trustmarkinitiative.org/) View Contact

Trustmark Support

help@trustmarkinitiative.org

555-555-5555

No Mailing Address

Keywords

PIV-I, Security, Identity, Federal Bridge

Issuance Criteria

yes(ALL)

Target Stakeholder

Organizations that are interested in implementing or making use of digital information systems in a manner that complies with widely accepted public key infrastructure standards and practices such as the X.509 Certificate Policy For The Federal Bridge Certification Authority (FBCA).

Target Recipient

Organizations that want to demonstrate that they provide and/or consume digital information services in a manner that complies with widely accepted public key infrastructure standards and practices such as the X.509 Certificate Policy For The Federal Bridge Certification Authority (FBCA).

Target Relying Party

Organizations and individuals that require their trusted partners' computer and information systems to comply with widely accepted public key infrastructure standards and practices such as the X.509 Certificate Policy For The Federal Bridge Certification Authority (FBCA).

Target Provider

Organizations that audit or evaluate other organizations for compliance with widely accepted public key infrastructure standards and practices such as the X.509 Certificate Policy For The Federal Bridge Certification Authority (FBCA).

Provider Eligibility Criteria

Any organization or business entity may act as a Trustmark Provider for trustmarks under this Trustmark Definition.

Assessor Qualifications

Any individual employed or contracted by the Trustmark Provider may act as the assessor for trustmarks under this Trustmark Definition.

Trustmark Revocation Criteria

For any trustmark issued under this Trustmark Definition, the Trustmark Provider must revoke the trustmark upon any condition whereby one or more Conformance Criteria cease to be satisfied.

Extension Description

This Trustmark Definition requires no extension data.

Legal Notice

This artifact is published by the Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI) as part of the Trustmark Initiative. This artifact and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis, and GTRI disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to any warranty that the use of the information herein will not infringe any rights or any implied warranties or merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In addition, GTRI disclaims legal liability for any loss incurred as a result of the use or reliance on the document or the information contained herein.

Sources (1)

FBCA-CP	X.509 Certificate Policy For The Federal Bridge Certification Authority (FBCA) Version 2.27 December 2, 2013

Also available as XML or JSON